Talk to an Owuorian for slightly under 1 millisecond and you will come out with infinite references to ‘sexual sins’.
We have observed that Owuorians hear the word sex more than Jesus Christ.
Almost all cults stumble when it comes to matters sex.
Catholicism has the weird theory of SINLESSNESS of Mary the Mother of Jesus alleging that she had to be SINLESS to bring forth a SINLESS Christ.
But what about her parents?
If SINLESSNESS is mandatory on parents for SINLESS siblings, then her parents must have been similarly SINLESS.
Her parents’ parents too and so forth all the way to David who we all know sinned. Try and take this to a Catholic and ask them to get back to you in the next 3650 days.
Then they insist Mary must have remained virgin hence the doctrine of Perpetual Virginity as losing virginity would somewhat defile her.
Sex is that evil according to them.
And that’s why you have celibacy.
You have positions you can’t occupy if your loins are active.
End result? Countless sex abuse cases. Point is, a confused or warped understanding of sex has devastating consequences.
Enter Owuorism where some positions are simply inaccessible if you are sexually active. Kevin K. Okwara overheard a strange rule years back to the effect that to share a podium with Owuor, married ministers had to abstain for 7 days before. A Sabbath of dry spell.
Does sex defile?
Sex is not man’s innovation; it’s God’s idea and the only thing you may add to it is flavor. Like for instance you may [REDACTED]…….
What madness is that? But we are talking about Owuorism where you are perennially shocked by the madness that passes for doctrine.
We came across this clip by Owuor and we won’t swear but it is one of the strangest spin we have ever heard on sexual sins.
We wish you can all listen for yourselves lest we dilute the foolishness with which he delivers it. But for the sake of those traumatized brothers and sisters who can’t stand hearing Owuor’s voice, we will do it.
Owuor is reading from Romans:
Romans 13:1-2 (ESV)
1 Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. 2 Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment.
Somewhere inside a verse that has absolutely nothing to do with sex, Owuor fishes sex. Water out of the rock.
If there are miracles Owuor pulls effortlessly it is seeing sex where none exists. Is this joker celibate? His interest in sex exceeds that of married men.
Very tempting to wonder whether he is projecting his proclivities on his hapless simpletons who make up his flock.
Owuor gives an illustration of marriages where one spouse is not born again. This happens all the time. Some spouses come to faith before others.
Owuor says that submission by the believing to the unbelieving spouse is sexual sin.
One does not take much imagination to see he is addressing sexual relations in such unions.
Owuor is smart; he tells the pastors not to prescribe divorce but to only stop at pronouncing such as sexual sins, leaving the believing spouse to their devices.
What options do such spouses have? Every waking moment a thick cloud of guilt hangs over them. No matter how they repent they keep falling back again.
This is enough to drive spouses to deny each other conjugal rights and separation!
What’s worse, born again in Owuorism means following Owuor so you can imagine what happens when Owuorians depart from paganism, turn worthless gods, and serve the living God.
The remaining spouses will regard them as unbelievers and defraud them.
Are there any scriptures that remotely hint at this definition of sexual sins?
No. In fact, Paul by Holy Spirit already envisaged this situation of a Believing and unbelieving spouses in a union. Listen to Paul:
1 Corinthians 7:13-16 (ESV)
13 If any woman has a husband who is an unbeliever, and he consents to live with her, she should not divorce him. 14 For the unbelieving husband is made holy because of his wife, and the unbelieving wife is made holy because of her husband. Otherwise, your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy. 15 But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases, the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace. 16 For how do you know, wife, whether you will save your husband? Or how do you know, husband, whether you will save your wife?
Salvation is no ground for divorce.
In fact, Paul favors remaining together.
Not how wisely he addresses it. If the unbelieving spouse ‘lefts’, the believing is no longer bound to them, and many move on.
Paul is writing to believers in a world with unbelievers where contact and interaction between them is inevitable.
Believers MUST not initiate separation.
Supposing ‘submission’ (sex relations) is sexual sin.
Paul is telling the believing to remain in sin or celibate while married.
Imagine an unbelieving man coming home and the believing wife resists any advances.
What is the husband to do? He will stray or divorce her, and the Owuorian wife can now freely serve Baal.
And that beloved, that’s how Owuor who at least publicly is celibate and unmarried is breaking marriages.
Note he won’t ask them to divorce but by declaring one as living in sexual sin and then threaten them with missing his imagination staircase, nobody in their right mind would give in to sex.
(Adapted from Ikev Ivooke)